Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41460049›Full record

ArticleJournal of health services research & policy2026

What is the quality of care at the end of life? Qualitative findings from a nationally-representative post-bereavement survey across England and Wales.

Joanna Goodrich, Sophie Pask, Chukwuebuka Okwuosa, Therese Johansson, Lynn Laidlaw, Cara Ghiglieri, Rachel Chambers, Anna E Bone, Stephen Barclay, Fliss E M Murtagh and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health services research & policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Joanna GoodrichCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0114-7488
Sophie PaskWolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Chukwuebuka OkwuosaWolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.ORCID 0009-0003-6138-7966
Therese JohanssonCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK.
Lynn LaidlawCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK.
Cara GhiglieriCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK.
Rachel ChambersCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK.
Anna E BoneCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK.
Stephen BarclayPalliative & End of Life Care in Cambridge (PELiCAM), Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Fliss E M MurtaghWolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Katherine E SleemanCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9777-4373

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ObjectivesTo explore the quality of end-of-life care in England and Wales using the experiences of bereaved family carers, and to develop person-centred quality of care domains for end-of-life care.MethodsQualitative analysis of free-text responses from a nationally-representative cross-sectional post-bereavement survey. Inductive thematic analysis of free-text responses to open-ended questions about care in last 3 months of life, circumstances of death, and experiences of care and bereavement, guided by the Institute of Medicine's quality domains. Participants were adults who registered the death of an adult relative in England and Wales between August and December 2022, identified using mortality data and stratified sampling (by age, gender, cause of death, place of death and geographical area).ResultsOf 1194 respondents, 1083 (90.7%) gave at least one free-text response. Six themes about quality of end-of-life care were identified: (1) accessing care; (2) timely and coordinated care; (3) individualised care; (4) the nature of communication and care; (5) family-centred care and support; and (6) safe and equitable care. Difficulty accessing care, challenges navigating a complex system, and poorly-coordinated care were interpreted as leading to a lack of physical and psychological safety. Timeliness of care was considered paramount but often not achieved.

Indexed as

BereavementCaregiversQuality of Health CareTerminal CareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient-Centered CareQualitative ResearchSurveys and Questionnairesend of life carefamily carershealth service qualitypalliative carepatient experience

Identifiers

PMID41460049
PMCPMC12988001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.