Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41459847›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2025

Evaluating The Feasibility and Acceptability of Cervical Cancer Screening in an Urban Slum Community by HPV Self-Sampling With the Aid of Telecounselling: Lessons Learnt.

Nilanchali Singh, Shivangi Mangal, Pranay Tanwar, Seema Singhal, Akanksha Yadav, Sandeep Mathur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nilanchali SinghDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4141-8441
Shivangi MangalDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Pranay TanwarDepartment of Laboratory Oncology, Dr BRAIRCH, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2357-976X
Seema SinghalDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8644-7684
Akanksha YadavDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0009-0005-9356-9427
Sandeep MathurDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHPV testing is the most sensitive method of secondary cervical cancer prevention and the preferred method recommended by the World Health Organization. To increase cervical cancer screening, self-sampling has been introduced, which has shown significant results in improving access and simplifying screening for large and remote populations in low- and middle-income countries. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of HPV self-sampling in an urban slum community using tele-counselling, which is a niche population for HPV positivity and HPV-related diseases.

methodsThis study is a community-based, prospective, single-arm design. Women were counselled telephonically about the methods of self-sampling, and HPV self-sampling kits were couriered to them. The collected kits were returned via courier and tested at the study site. In the case of a positive test result, the individual was linked to treatment at the study center. Test positives were offered either a 'see and treat' approach or colposcopy triage.

resultsIn the community, 982 women were enrolled in the study, but only 600 (61%) women consented to screening by HPV self-sampling. Ninety-six (15.6%) out of 600 women tested positive for Hr-HPV. Age, educational status, locality, occupation, menopausal status, and smoking status were similar in both screen-negative and screen-positive groups. Among the 600 women, 570 (95%) found it easy to take a self-sample, and 588 (98%) were satisfied with the overall experience. CIN I was found in 6 (6.4%), and CIN II was found in 4 (4.3%) cases. LEEP was performed in patients diagnosed with CIN II.

conclusionsHPV self-sampling is an acceptable method of cervical cancer screening, with an acceptance rate of 61% among urban slum women. It demonstrates that HPV self-sampling is feasible when supported by tele-counselling.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsPatient Acceptance of Health CareSelf CareUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedPoverty AreasPrognosisProspective StudiescommunityHPV Self-SamplingScreeningTele-counsellingTele-oncology

Identifiers

PMID41459847
PMCPMC13237445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.