Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41459843›Full record

SynthesisAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2025

Wilms Tumor Management: A Systematic Review Comparing SIOP and NWTS/COG Protocols in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcome.

Andika Abdul Rahim Damanik, Taufiq Nur Budaya, Kurnia Penta Seputra

Abstract readSystematic ReviewComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andika Abdul Rahim DamanikDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Malang, Indonesia.ORCID 0009-0000-4531-495X
Taufiq Nur BudayaDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Malang, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0001-8906-3144
Kurnia Penta SeputraDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Malang, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-7777-9660

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWilms tumor is the most common pediatric renal malignancy, with two predominant management approaches creating clinical decision-making challenges. SIOP advocates preoperative chemotherapy to reduce tumor burden, while NWTS/COG prioritizes immediate surgery for histopathological analysis. Evidence-based comparison is essential, particularly in resource-limited settings.

objectiveTo systematically compare preoperative chemotherapy (SIOP) versus upfront nephrectomy (NWTS/COG) protocols in Wilms tumor management by analyzing diagnostic accuracy, treatment efficacy, and surgical outcomes through direct comparative studies.

methodsA PRISMA 2020-guided systematic review was conducted, searching PubMed, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar for comparative studies (2015-2024) that directly compared SIOP and NWTS/COG protocols in pediatric Wilms tumor patients. Quality assessment was performed using the ROBINS-I tool.

resultsFour comparative studies encompassing 226 patients from developing countries (India, Pakistan, Iraq, Vietnam) were included. Diagnostic accuracy varied significantly, with SIOP protocols showing misdiagnosis rates of 17.4-21.7% in resource-limited settings, while NWTS protocols achieved 100% accuracy in the single study reporting this outcome. Surgical outcomes were heterogeneously reported: one Indian study found no intraoperative spillage in SIOP patients (0/23) versus 22.2% in NWTS patients (2/9), though this finding cannot be generalized due to single-center limitations. Postoperative complications varied by setting, with one Pakistani study reporting higher rates in SIOP patients (21% vs. 9.5%). Survival outcomes ranged from 80.9-96.7% across protocols and countries, with no consistent pattern favoring either approach.

conclusionNeither protocol demonstrates consistent superiority across all outcomes. Protocol selection should be individualized based on disease stage, diagnostic capabilities, and healthcare infrastructure. The limited number of comparative studies and heterogeneous reporting highlight the need for standardized outcome measures and larger multicenter trials.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsKidney NeoplasmsNephrectomyWilms TumorDactinomycinHumansPrognosisVincristineDactinomycinVincristinecomparative protocolsNephroblastomapediatric oncologyWilms tumor

Identifiers

PMID41459843
PMCPMC13237446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.