ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025
The extended hollowed mind: why foundational knowledge is indispensable in the age of AI.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) presents a fundamental duality for education: it simultaneously offers powerful cognitive extension while posing a significant risk of cognitive atrophy. This paper introduces the 'hollowed mind' as a conceptual framework to understand this risk-a state of dependency where the frictionless availability of AI-generated answers enables users to systematically bypass the effortful cognitive processes essential for deep learning. We argue this dynamic is driven by the 'Sovereignty Trap': a psychological mechanism where the AI's authoritative competence tempts users to cede their own intellectual judgment, mistaking access to information for genuine ability. To substantiate this claim, we synthesize a multi-disciplinary body of evidence from cognitive science (e.g., dual-process theory, cognitive load), neurobiology (e.g., conflict-monitoring networks), and developmental psychology. We use this foundation to explain the widely documented 'Expertise Duality'-why AI acts as a 'leveler' for novices but an 'amplifier' for experts. Moving beyond critique, this paper posits that the central challenge is one of environmental design, not user competence. We propose the 'Fortified Mind' as the pedagogical goal: a resilient internal architecture of indispensable knowledge and metacognitive skills required to achieve genuine 'Cognitive Sovereignty'. Finally, we outline a forward-looking research agenda focused on redesigning AI tools from 'answer engines' into cognitive training environments that promote effortful engagement. Our work provides a robust conceptual guide for educators, researchers, and system designers, arguing that in the age of AI, the cultivation of fundamental knowledge is not just relevant, but more crucial than ever.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.