ArticleEnvironmental and occupational health practice2025
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Online Social Support Scale.
Article in Environmental and occupational health practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to develop a Japanese version and a shortened version of the Online Social Support Scale and test their reliability and validity. Method: A 40-item scale was developed with the permission of the original developer to measure online and other social support, depressive symptoms, and self-esteem. Study participants were recruited online using snowball sampling. Internal and test-retest reliability were tested; confirmatory factor analysis was used to test for structural validity, and correlation analysis was used to test for convergent validity. A follow-up survey was conducted 2 weeks later to examine the test-retest reliability of the scale. A shortened 12-item version was also developed and tested. Result: A total of 288 people participated in the survey, of whom 254 (88.2%) responded to the follow-up survey. The Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.98 for the overall scale and ranged from 0.94-0.96 for the subscales. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.90 for the scale as a whole and ranged from 0.85-0.88 for the subscales. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed a four-factor structure with an acceptable model fit. The scale showed a significant positive correlation with social support and a significant negative correlation with depressive symptoms but no significant correlation with self-esteem. The shortened version demonstrated similar reliability and validity. Conclusion: The Japanese version of the Online Social Support Scale showed adequate reliability and some validity, and the short version showed adequate reliability and validity, making them useful tools for measuring online social support in various contexts, such as peer support groups or remote work environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.