ArticleEnvironmental and occupational health practice2025
Prospective association between high stress profile as defined using the Japanese Stress Check Program manual and long-term sickness absence among a working population with various backgrounds: a two-wave longitudinal study.
Article in Environmental and occupational health practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: We aimed to examine the prospective association between stress profile as defined using the Stress Check Program manual and long-term sickness absence among a working population with various backgrounds. Methods: We analyzed 1,741 participants who participated in two online surveys in December 2023 and October 2024. In the first survey, we asked participants to complete the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire and evaluated their stress profile using the Japanese Stress Check Program manual. In the second survey, we asked participants if they had experienced sickness absence for 1 month or longer between the first and second surveys. We then examined the association between stress status in the first survey and experience of sickness absence during the waves. We calculated the odds ratio after adjusting for gender, age, marital status, educational attainment, household income, employment contract, average working hours per week, occupation, and industrial sector. To estimate the impact of high stress on sickness absence, we calculated the population attributable risk for high stress. Results: After adjusting for confounding factors, we found that high stress was associated with sickness absence, with an odds ratio of 3.54 (95% confidence interval, 2.05-6.12). The corresponding population attributable risk for high stress was 21.4%. Conclusions: The observed prospective association between high stress (as defined using the Stress Check Program manual) and long-term sickness absence among a working population from a wide range of occupations and industries provides evidence supporting the usability of the index in occupational health practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.