ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Intercropping with pear and cover crops as a strategy to boost soil carbon sequestration in the Taihang mountains' fragile ecosystems.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Soil carbon sequestration capacity in ecologically fragile areas of the Taihang Mountains' gneiss slopes demands immediate attention. This study evaluated the synergistic effects of land-use transition (from barren hills to cropland to pear orchards) and cover crop intercropping on soil carbon storage. Methods: Field sampling and experiments were conducted at 72 sites in Fuping County. The analysis combined multi-index assessment of soil physicochemical properties with partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Results: Land-use transition significantly increased soil carbon storage. In 8-year-old pear orchards, the organic carbon storage in the 0-20 cm soil layer reached 26.08 tC/ha, representing a 151.89% increase compared to cultivated land (10.35 tC/ha). Meanwhile, soil carbon storage in the 20-40 cm layer increased by 83.97% to 13.58 tC/ha. Under the cover cropping pattern, ryegrass in the surface 0-20 cm soil of 8-year-old orchards showed an 18.5% improvement in efficiency over natural grass. In the 20-40 cm deep soil, winter rape increased organic carbon content by 22.43% to 10.59 g/kg. Discussion: The synergistic mechanism was attributed to increased carbon input from cover crops and root systems, optimized soil physical structure (bulk density decreased by 5.1%-8.0%, porosity increased by 2.1%-4.1%), and formation of a nutrient-carbon pool synergy. Available potassium, phosphorus, and organic carbon were significantly positively correlated. This pear orchard and cover crop intercropping system exemplifies a practical Nature-based Solutions (NbS) pathway, achieving an annual carbon sink growth rate of 4.2-5.8 tC/(ha·a). Its core mechanism lies in constructing a triple synergy of "carbon sequestration enhancement, structural optimization, and nutrient cycling", which enhances ecosystem services multidimensionally while fostering a resilient agricultural production system. This practice provides a technical paradigm for synergizing carbon neutrality goals and ecological restoration in fragile mountainous areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.