SynthesisFrontiers in surgery2025
Significance of Bishop score in single vs. double balloon catheterization for induction in labor; a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To conduct a meta-analysis comparing Bishop scores in newborns resulting from single balloon versus double balloon labor induction methods. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of RCT's that compared single and double balloon catheters for inducing labor. Relevant literature studies were located by searching PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. The primary outcome measure was the Bishop score, while secondary outcomes included the mode of delivery, complications, time interval from catheter insertion to the delivery, and the Apgar score at five minutes. Results: Our meta-analysis encompassed 6 RCT involving 996 women who underwent labor induction. We detected a substantial variation in the Bishop scores, with SBC induction yielding higher scores. Specifically, neonates delivered using SBC had higher Bishop scores than those delivered using DBC. This highlights the clinical significance of Bishop scores in identifying infants who may require immediate medical attention. However, no significant differences were found in mode of delivery, complications, or Apgar scores between the two groups ( Conclusion: Labor induction using a single balloon catheter appears to be more effective at ripening the cervix, as indicated by higher Bishop scores. This suggests that it might be a more favorable method for inducing labor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.