ArticleProceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine2024
Leveraging Machine Learning for Predicting Circadian Transcription in mRNAs and lncRNAs.
Article in Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Expression Landscape and Circadian Regulation of lncRNAs in the Kidney.Acta physiologica (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The circadian clock is a molecular timekeeper, regulating the rhythmic expression of thousands of transcripts in mammals. While the transcriptional regulation of rhythmic messenger RNAs (mRNAs) has been extensively studied, that of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) remains largely unexplored. In this study, we aim to investigate how rhythmic transcription of lncRNAs is regulated by comparing their regulatory mechanisms with those of mRNAs. To this end, we applied machine learning models to predict rhythmic transcription patterns using k-mer-based DNA sequence features in the promoter. By training models on mRNAs and testing on lncRNAs and vice versa, we demonstrate that the regulatory mechanisms governing the rhythmic transcription is different between mRNAs and lncRNAs. Additionally, we employed SHAP analysis to identify potential DNA features critical for rhythmic transcription of both mRNAs and lncRNAs. Our findings offer valuable insights into regulatory elements important for rhythmic RNA transcription and demonstrate the utility of machine learning models in predicting gene expression patterns using DNA sequence features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.