ArticleData in brief2026
Updating the global weighting factor for biodiversity impact assessment in LCA.
Article in Data in brief, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Life‑cycle impact assessment (LCIA) is progressively expanding to address biodiversity impacts, but spatial heterogeneity continues to dominate the associated uncertainty. To account for this, the Ecoregion Factor (EF)-a dimensionless weighting coefficient-modulates biodiversity‑impact scores according to the ecological richness of the ecoregion in which a land‑use takes place. Since the initial publication, the underlying spatial datasets have been superseded by more recent releases. Consequently, we recomputed the EF using the latest ecoregional delineation and the most recent global layers for grasslands, forests and wetlands. To facilitate integration with LCIA frameworks that operate at the national level, the updated EF values were aggregated to country‑level averages by calculating an area‑weighted mean of the normalised EF across all ecoregions intersecting each nation's borders. This yields a robust geographic adjustment factor that preserves the spatial nuance of ecoregional biodiversity while making biodiversity impact assessments feasible even when inventory data are available only at the country scale. By providing an up‑to‑date, geographically calibrated weighting coefficient, the revised EF enhances the spatial granularity of biodiversity‑focused LCIA results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.