Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41459365›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2025

Innovation through networking: the single contact points for employers in the German vocational rehabilitation and participation system.

Jana York, Sarah Lamb, Sarah Schulze, Jan Jochmaring, Jörg-Tobias Kuhn, Bastian Pelka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jana YorkResearch Unit Sociology of Rehabilitation and Participation, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.
Sarah LambResearch Unit Sociology of Rehabilitation and Participation, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.
Sarah SchulzeResearch Unit Sociology of Rehabilitation and Participation, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.
Jan JochmaringResearch Unit Sociology of Rehabilitation and Participation, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.
Jörg-Tobias KuhnResearch Unit Methods of Empirical Educational Research, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.
Bastian PelkaResearch Unit Sociology of Rehabilitation and Participation, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The German vocational rehabilitation and participation system is highly complex due to fragmented legal responsibilities and institutional structures. To address this and improve labor market inclusion for people with severe disabilities, Single Contact Points for Employers [Einheitliche Ansprechstellen für Arbeitgeber (EAA)] were established in 2022. The EAA are legally mandated, provider-independent entities that support employers in hiring and retaining employees with disabilities. The article analyzes the network structure of the EAA within the vocational rehabilitation and participation system, how the structure is evaluated, and which partners are most relevant to the EAA. Methods: A network analysis was conducted through egocentric network maps ( Results: The EAA work closely with policy actors from the vocational rehabilitation and participation system who provide advice and services for participation in work, such as Integration Services, Employment Agencies, and Specialist Agencies. These collaborations are characterized by mutual information exchange and generally positive cooperation. Actors from the economy, civil society, and academic sector are underrepresented in the EAA's overall network. Employers' associations were rarely named as key partners, and civil society organizations were absent. Discussion: The EAA's strong integration into policy networks underscores their institutional relevance. However, their limited ties to economic and civil entities suggest a constrained capacity for innovation. This pattern reflects both the strengths of their legal mandate and the challenges of acting independently within a highly structured system. Expanding their relational scope could foster more holistic solutions for inclusive employment.

Indexed as

employer counselingmixed methodssingle contact points for employerssocial innovationsystem of vocational rehabilitation and participation

Identifiers

PMID41459365
PMCPMC12741090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.