ArticleTherapeutic advances in rare disease
From care to cure: a patient engagement framework for rare disease and orphan drug research.
Article in Therapeutic advances in rare disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rare diseases (RDs) encompass over 6000-8000 conditions, with 94% lacking available therapies. These conditions affect 400 million people globally, including three million Canadians, who face numerous challenges throughout their healthcare journey. Patient engagement (PE) is increasingly recognized as essential for improving outcomes yet remains inadequate in RD and orphan drug research particularly in Canada, where a national strategy for integrating RD patients' perspectives is lacking. To address this gap, this paper presents a Rare Disease Patient Engagement Framework (RDPEF), a structured model designed to support meaningful PE across all levels of healthcare, including research. Objectives: To develop a RDPEF that addresses barriers to engagement, reduces stigma, and incorporates patient experience as a core element in RD and orphan drug research and decision-making. Design: A conceptual framework development study informed by qualitative research and a targeted review of existing PE frameworks. Methods: The RDPEF was developed using a systematic approach that combined a review of existing literature on PE frameworks with new qualitative research on the experiences of RD patients in Canada. Semi-structured interviews examined patients' healthcare journeys, focusing on disease management, access to orphan drugs, and opportunities for engagement. A thematic analysis of the existing literature and interview data identified common challenges, which guided the framework's design. The RDPEF integrates elements from various other PE models, customizes them to the specific needs of RD patients, and emphasizes engagement across the entire orphan drug lifecycle. Results: Thematic findings from qualitative research highlighted limited to no patient involvement beyond clinical trials, significant stigma and discrimination, and the absence of structured engagement in drug review and reimbursement processes. These insights informed the development of the RDPEF, which outlines levels and forms of engagement, guiding principles (including stigma reduction), and mechanisms for integrating patient experience across healthcare, policy, and research domains. Conclusion: The RDPEF is a timely tool for enhancing PE in orphan drug research. By addressing engagement barriers, reducing stigma, and centering patient experience, the framework offers a roadmap for patients, researchers, healthcare providers, and policymakers to create a more inclusive and responsive system for RD patients in Canada.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.