ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2026
Shared Decision-Making Supported by Outcome Information During Discharge Planning of Patients Hospitalized With Stroke.
Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The SHOUT-STROKE study aimed to evaluate the effects of a shared decision-making (SDM) intervention on decision-making, health, and process outcomes during discharge planning of hospitalized patients with stroke. The intervention included a patient decision aid (PtDA) with integrated outcome information, training for health care professionals, and an implementation strategy. Methods: A prospective multiple interrupted time-series study was conducted across 7 Dutch hospitals between November 2019 and March 2022. The study comprised 3 phases: a pre-implementation phase evaluating standard care, a transition phase integrating the PtDA and training into existing stroke care pathways, and a post-implementation phase evaluating the new workflow. Effects per hospital were estimated using segmented autoregression and combined in a meta-analysis to assess the overall effect. Results: Of 635 eligible patients, 462 (73%) completed the primary outcome measure, the SDM-Q-9, a 9-item questionnaire assessing patient-reported levels of SDM (score range 0-100). The overall effect on SDM-Q-9 scores was -4.5 points (95% CI -11.3 to 2.2). No significant overall differences were observed in secondary decision-making outcomes (e.g., decisional conflict) or health outcomes (e.g., quality of life). Knowledge scores improved significantly in 2 hospitals, with an effect of 0.85 points (95% CI 0.08 to 1.6) in Hospital 4 and 0.94 points (95% CI 0.20 to 1.7) in Hospital 6. Of the 234 patients in the post-implementation phase, 137 (59%) received the PtDA, of whom 40% used it. Most patients reported that the PtDA with integrated outcome information was useful for decision-making and indicated that they would recommend the PtDA to other patients. Discussion: The SDM intervention was appreciated by patients but did not significantly improve SDM levels or other decision-making or health outcomes. The significant improvement in patient knowledge scores in 2 hospitals is notable but insufficient to fully empower patients to actively participate in SDM. Future efforts should focus on optimizing the implementation process to achieve more impactful outcomes. Clinical Trials Registration: The SHOUT-STROKE study was registered in the Dutch Clinical Trial Register and automatically listed in the International Clinical Trial Registry Platform: Registration IDs: NL8375 | NL-OMON21735. Link to the registration: trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NL-OMON21735.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.