ArticleClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR2025
Consequences of Canada's Drug Agency Reimbursement Recommendations for New Medicines and Pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance Price Negotiations on Patient Access.
Article in ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the Opportunity for an Accelerated Access Pathway for Health Canada Priority Review Drugs: A Comparative Analysis with Ontario's FAST Pilot Program.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Most-Favored-Nation Benchmarking Versus Value-Based Contracting: Institutional Fit of Pharmaceutical Pricing Tools in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom.Health services insights · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Prescription drugs are excluded from Canada's federal legislation covering health care. Each provincial government has developed its own drug plan. To get new prescription medicines listed in these plans, developers must pass regulatory review, health technology assessment and price negotiation, and convince individual government plans to list their drugs. The objective of this research is to assess how many reimbursement recommendations issued by Canada's Drug Agency (CDA) have clinical and/or price conditions and what the consequences are. Methods: Data were obtained on drugs with CDA recommendations issued between January 2020 and December 2024, together with dates of price negotiations between the pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance (pCPA) and manufacturers by the end of July 2025 and listings in government plans relating to the same drugs by early November 2025. Results: Of 344 CDA recommendations, only three (0.9%) were unconditional reimbursement, 291 (84.6%) reimbursement with clinical criteria and/or a price condition, and 50 (14.5%) no reimbursement. Median time for CDA reviews was 221 days (interquartile range (IQR): 199-282 days). Where recommended to achieve cost-effectiveness of $50,000/quality-adjusted life-year, median reduction was 74.5% (IQR: 50.0%-90.0%). Median time for the pCPA to decide whether to negotiate was 128 days (IQR: 73-191 days) and median negotiation time was 131 days (IQR: 82-219 days). The median time between submission to CDA and pCPA outcome was 518 days (IQR: 394-633 days). Government drug plan listing rates for drugs successfully negotiated with the pCPA ranged from 58.6% to 91.6%. Five patients had prior-authorization requests to a private insurer for costly drugs denied because the drugs had conditional CDA recommendations. Conclusion: CDA and pCPA processes take considerable time and listing decisions by government drug plans add extra time before potential access by patients. Nearly all CDA reimbursement recommendations, which are intended for government drug plans (not private payers), are conditional.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.