ArticleCurrent zoology2025
How female treefrogs weigh unimodal and multimodal sexual displays in the absence and presence of noise.
Article in Current zoology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mate choice plays a pivotal role in wildlife reproduction and population sustainability. The assessment of sexual displays in noise poses a common challenge for wildlife. Multimodal signals are hypothesized to be favored since they improve the accuracy of signal detection and discrimination in noise. We verified whether female treefrogs exhibit a heightened reliance on visual cues when acoustic cues are drowned out by the noise and whether increased call complexity can compensate for the attractiveness differences between unimodal and multimodal signals. Our results demonstrated that female treefrogs prefer longer courtship signals in the absence of noise. Meanwhile, increasing call complexity effectively mitigated the attractiveness difference between acoustic and visual/multimodal signals. However, female treefrogs did not shift their reliance to visual signals when masked by noise. Noise prolonged the duration required for females to make a mate choice in most cases and reduced female preferences for attractive signals regardless of whether the mating scene was unimodal or multimodal, which lends further the hypothesis of cross-sensory interference. We examined how female treefrogs weigh unimodal and multimodal courtship cues in the absence and presence of noise and offered distinct perspectives on the interplay of multi-sensory sexual displays in noise. This study enhanced our comprehension of noise interference in mating choice and established a novel, comprehensive scientific foundation for the prevention and control of multimodal sensory pollution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.