Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41459315›Full record

ArticleCurrent zoology2025

Bruno Cajado, Ana Riesgo, Rodrigo Nunes-da-Fonseca, Diego Guerra-Almeida, Bruno Rodrigues, Emilio Lanna

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current zoology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bruno CajadoGraduate Program in Biodiversity and Evolution, Institute of Biology, Federal University of Bahia, Rua Barão de Jeremoabo s/n, 40170-110, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Ana RiesgoDepartment of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales de Madrid (CSIC), c/ José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006, Madrid, Spain.
Rodrigo Nunes-da-FonsecaLaboratório Integrado de Ciências Morfofuncionais, Instituto de Biodiversidade e Sustentabilidade NUPEM, Campus UFRJ, Av. São José do Barreto 764, 27965-550, Macaé, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Diego Guerra-AlmeidaLaboratório Integrado de Ciências Morfofuncionais, Instituto de Biodiversidade e Sustentabilidade NUPEM, Campus UFRJ, Av. São José do Barreto 764, 27965-550, Macaé, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Bruno RodriguesLaboratório Integrado de Ciências Morfofuncionais, Instituto de Biodiversidade e Sustentabilidade NUPEM, Campus UFRJ, Av. São José do Barreto 764, 27965-550, Macaé, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Emilio LannaInstituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Rua Barão de Jeremoabo s/n, 40170-110, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6170-1842

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sponges (Porifera) are traditionally considered to lack defined body axes and regional specialization. Understanding whether sponges exhibit preferential growth regions and axial patterning is essential for elucidating the evolution of metazoan body plans. Here, we compared two body regions of the repent morph of

Indexed as

archaeocytedevelopmental biologyEvoDevoRNA-seqtranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID41459315
PMCPMC12742393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.