Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41459311›Full record

ArticleCurrent zoology2025

Human vocalizations impact skink risk assessment depending on human exposure.

Carla Bruebach, Lauren Harper, David Jen, Amanda Leyel, Sean O'Fallon, Daniel T Blumstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current zoology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carla BruebachDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, 621 Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, USA.
Lauren HarperDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, 621 Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, USA.
David JenDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, 621 Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7537-6237
Amanda LeyelDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, 621 Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5285-3545
Sean O'FallonDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, 621 Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0169-3692
Daniel T BlumsteinDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, 621 Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5793-9244

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sounds, like screams, which contain acoustic nonlinearities can elicit fearful, emotional responses in animals. In humans, screams activate the amygdala and are perceived as less positive than spoken words. We conducted a playback experiment to see if two skink species (one of which is known to negatively respond to nonlinearities) responded differently to human spoken words and screams. We broadcast short phrases of humans screaming, humans speaking, or a control, a novel bird song. We studied the immediate response by quantifying the change in rates of vigilance and locomotion. We also studied a slightly delayed response in risk assessments by measuring skink flight initiation distance after the playback. Furthermore, we conducted experiments in nonresidential and residential areas to understand how human exposure may influence human discrimination and potentially valence perception (i.e., how sound is emotionally perceived). Blue-tailed skinks (

Indexed as

blue-tailed skinkflight initiation distancehuman exposurenonlinearityvalencewhite-bellied copper-striped skink

Identifiers

PMID41459311
PMCPMC12742395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.