ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2026
Oral Fluid Concentrations of Tenofovir and Emtricitabine for Monitoring HIV Antiretroviral Adherence: Findings From a Randomized Trial with Directly Observed Therapy (TARGET Study).
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early identification of non-adherence to daily antiretroviral therapies may facilitate targeted transition to long-acting HIV regimens for individuals most likely to benefit. This study evaluated the feasibility of detecting emtricitabine (FTC) and tenofovir (TFV) in oral fluids to monitor daily oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) adherence. Methods: We collected 241 oral fluids from 22 HIV-negative adults randomized to 2, 4, or 7 doses/week of oral PrEP with FTC/TDF for directly observed therapy. Generalized Estimating Equations were used to examine the associations between FTC/TFV detectability and three dimensions of PrEP adherence: dosing recency, cumulative dosing time, and dosing frequency. We also assessed the diagnostic accuracy of FTC levels in oral fluids for predicting daily oral PrEP non-adherence (time since the last dose >24 hours). Results: Among 165 oral fluids with a time since the last dose within 48 hours, 9.0% had detectable TFV, and 53.3% had detectable FTC. Compared with oral fluids collected within 24 hours since the last dose, those collected between 24 and 48 hours since the last dose had significantly lower odds of having detectable FTC (odds ratio: 0.21, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.11-0.38). An FTC threshold of <7.5 ng/mL achieved a sensitivity of 90% (95% CI: 84%-94%) and a specificity of 65% (95% CI: 57%-74%) for identifying recent PrEP non-adherence. Conclusions: FTC can be detected in oral fluids and may be a promising pharmacologic marker for identifying recent PrEP non-adherence as early as one dose missed. TFV had lower concentrations in oral fluids, and is not suitable for adherence monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.