Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41459276›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Emotions in green: unveiling the paradox of green human resource management in shaping employee conduct.

Xueling Wang, Qingjin Wang, Jinlei Hao, Bolin Niu, Wenjie Xu, Yuhan Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xueling WangBusiness School of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Qingjin WangBusiness School of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Jinlei HaoBusiness School of Lanzhou University of Finance and Economics, Lanzhou, China.
Bolin NiuBusiness School of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Wenjie XuBusiness School of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Yuhan LiuBusiness School of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines the paradoxical dual effects of Green Human Resource Management (GHRM) in the hospitality industry. While prior comparative research has shed light on its positive impacts on organizations, the exploration of its potential adverse effects, particularly the reasons behind its paradoxical effects, is less developed. Grounded in the cognitive appraisal theory of emotion, this research analyze 407 valid survey responses from China to investigate the conditions under which GHRM leads to both benefical and detrimental organizational effects. The findings reveal that for employees with high green personal values, GHRM triggers positive emotions, thereby promoting organizational green advocacy behaviors. Conversely, for employees with lower green values, it induces negative emotions, which in turn increase workplace cheating behaviors. Theoretically, this study advances the understanding of the paradoxical nature of GHRM, particularly within the context of the hospiality sector. Practically, it offers valuable insights for implementing green management in the industry, broadening the comprehension of how corporate green management in the industry, broading the comprehension of how corporate green initiatives interact with employee values. These insights can assist the hospitality sector in adopting GHRM more effectively, enhacing environmental performance, and responding to the growing environmental concerns of customers and stakeholders.

Indexed as

cognitive appraisal theoryemotionsgreen advocacy behaviorgreen human resource managementgreen valueworkplace cheating behavior

Identifiers

PMID41459276
PMCPMC12738352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.