SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2025
Speech analysis for detecting depression in older adults: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A gender-emotion interaction multi-task network for depression recognition via transformer-based multimodal fusion.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Depression is highly prevalent among older adults, exceeding rates in the general population. Traditional diagnostic tools, such as interviews and self-reports, are limited by subjectivity, time demands, and overlap with age-related changes. Speech, as a non-invasive behavioral marker, is promising for objective depression assessment, but its specific utility in older populations remains less explored. This systematic review identifies speech characteristics linked to depression in older adults and their clinical potential. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a search was conducted in Medline, CINAHL, PsychINFO, IEEE, and Web of Science for studies published in the last 10 years. Eligible studies included adults aged over 55, with depression diagnosis or symptoms, and at least one acoustic variable. Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria. Methodological quality was assessed with JBI tools, and speech parameters and classification outcomes were extracted. Results: Depressed older adults consistently showed slower speech rate, longer and more variable pauses, reduced intensity, and altered voice quality. Predictive studies using machine learning reached accuracies of 76-95%, particularly when age and gender were controlled. Findings were inconsistent for F0 and formants: women often showed lower peak frequency and amplitude, while men displayed higher amplitude change and formant frequencies. Limitations included small clinical samples and insufficient control of confounders, especially cognitive impairment. Conclusion: Speech analysis appears reliable, non-invasive, and cost-effective for detecting depression in older adults. Temporal, prosodic, and spectral features show strong diagnostic potential. Further research with larger, representative samples is required to validate speech-based biomarkers as complements to existing assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.