ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025
DP-CARE: a differentially private classifier for mental health analysis in social media posts.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Mental health NLP models are increasingly used to detect psychological states such as stress and depression from user-generated social media content. Although transformer based models such as MentalBERT achieve strong predictive performance, they are typically trained on sensitive data, raising concerns about memorization and unintended disclosure of personally identifiable information. Methods: We propose DP-CARE, a simple yet effective privacy-preserving framework that attaches a lightweight classifier to a frozen, domain-specific encoder and trains it using Differentially Private AdamW (DP-AdamW). This approach mitigates privacy risks while maintaining computational efficiency. Results: We evaluate DP-CARE on the Dreaddit dataset for stress detection. Our method achieves competitive performance, with an F1 score of 78.08% and a recall of 88.67%, under a privacy budget of ε ≈ 3. Discussion: The results indicate that lightweight, differentially private fine-tuning offers a practical and ethical approach for deploying NLP systems in privacy-sensitive mental health contexts. DP-CARE demonstrates that strong predictive performance can be retained while significantly reducing privacy risks associated with training on sensitive user data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.