ReviewFrontiers in digital health2025
Cognitive frontiers: neurotechnology and global internet governance.
Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article explores the largely uncharted intersection of neurotechnology and Internet governance on the international policy agenda. Neurotechnologies encompass a broad spectrum of functions and applications, from the direct recording or alteration of brain activity to the analysis of emotions and mental states through data collected from wearable devices, applications, and AI-based tools. Innovations such as cochlear implants, sleep optimisation technologies, and immersive educational tools are already available, and significant investments are made in the next generation of devices that blur the lines between mind, machine, and action, posing unprecedented challenges. While some international organisations have begun addressing the ethical and human rights implications of neurotechnology, there remains significant fragmentation and a lack of clarity regarding its integration into Internet governance. Critical issues related to neural infrastructure, standards, access to technologies, and protections for neural data have been overlooked in the 2024 Global Digital Compact and might remain off the agenda for the upcoming 20th review of the World Summit on the Information Society. This contribution underscores the urgent need to analyse the profound implications of neurotechnology, advocating for proactive measures that align with progress made across Internet governance fora, with respect to legal safeguards, multistakeholder consultations and institutional pillars.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.