Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41459191›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of social robotics2025

TICK: A Knowledge Processing Infrastructure for Cognitive Trust in Human-Robot Interaction.

Mohammed Diab, Yiannis Demiris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of social robotics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mohammed DiabPersonal Robotics Laboratory, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5743-5190
Yiannis DemirisPersonal Robotics Laboratory, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to assess trust within domains necessitating Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), such as social and assistive robotics, a multifaceted cognitive infrastructure is essential to facilitate shared knowledge among the participants. This knowledge encompasses information pertaining to the behaviour, beliefs, intentions, and situational awareness of the participants, including assessments of vulnerability, reliability, and risk. The developed knowledge takes the form of a domain-agnostic ontology with multiple layers, allowing for reusability across diverse HRI tasks, and resulting in actions that can be undertaken by a participant to establish trust with the other party. This research introduces the concept of Trust-Inferring Infrastructure for Cognitive Knowledge (TICK) for domains requiring HRI, comprising three key constructs: performance, process, and purpose. Subsequently, the proposed infrastructure is evaluated through real-world scenarios involving humans as trustors and robots as trustees. To validate TICK in these real scenarios, a multimodal sensory module has been integrated into the reasoning mechanism, enhancing the robots' capabilities in understanding human intentions, perceiving the current situation, offering advice to humans, personalising their behaviour to build human trust, and evolving the robot's trustworthiness based on its performance during interactions. Trust is automatically assessed based on proximity and adherence to the robots' recommendations. Furthermore, to quantitatively assess the scalability and flexibility of the proposed approach, a series of experiments were conducted involving a kitchen domain handover task between humans and a table-top robotic arm in a lab setting, encompassing various types of objects and different scene contexts.

Indexed as

Human–robot interactionInteraction memoriesKnowledge-driven approachTrust infrastructure

Identifiers

PMID41459191
PMCPMC12738630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.