ArticleEJIFCC2025
AI Based Predictive Modelling for Internal Quality Control: A Machine Learning Approach Using Altair RapidMiner.
Article in EJIFCC, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a rule-based tool for quality management reporting in a genetics laboratory.Practical laboratory medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Internal Quality Control (IQC) ensures accuracy and reliability in laboratory testing but traditionally relies on reactive, threshold-based methods. These approaches often fail to detect subtle process deviations in time, potentially compromising quality. Objective: To develop and validate a machine learning-based predictive model for early detection of IQC deviations using Altair RapidMiner, enhancing proactive quality management in clinical laboratories. Methods: A retrospective analytical study was conducted using 4,572 IQC records from Meenakshi Labs, covering 8 analytes across multiple instruments. Data preprocessing included cleaning, feature engineering, and encoding. Three classification algorithms - Decision Tree, Gradient Boosted Trees, and Random Forest - were developed using Altair RapidMiner's no-code environment. Models were evaluated via 10-fold cross-validation using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and ROC-AUC metrics. Results: The Random Forest model outperformed others with 92.0% accuracy, 91.0% precision, 89.4% recall, and an AUC of 0.932. Key predictive features included analyte type, control level, reagent lot, and operator ID. The model correctly predicted 68% of future out-of-control events within a 24-hour window, demonstrating potential for preventive action. Feature importance analysis enhanced model interpretability. Conclusion: Machine learning, particularly Random Forest, effectively augments IQC by enabling predictive monitoring. Altair RapidMiner offers a user-friendly platform, making advanced analytics accessible even without programming skills. This approach aligns with Quality 4.0 initiatives, promoting data-driven, real-time decision-making in laboratory quality assurance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41459179PMC12743339What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.