ArticleTherapeutics and clinical risk management2025
Comparative Effectiveness of Propofol-Sufentanil vs Propofol-Fentanyl in Elderly Patients Undergoing Transurethral Resection of the Prostate.
Article in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the anesthetic effect and cognitive function impact of propofol-sufentanil (PS) versus propofol-fentanyl (PF) in elderly patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) under general anesthesia (GA). Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted in First People's Hospital of Yongkang City. They included 98 patients aged 65 and above who underwent TURP under GA between October 2023 and March 2025. 49 patients who received PS were matched with a cohort of propofol-fentanyl (PF) in a 1:1 ratio. Compare the hemodynamic parameters (heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP)) of two groups at 30 minutes before anesthesia induction (T0), after anesthesia completion (T1), at the time of skin incision (T2), at the end of surgery (T3), at the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) (T4), 15 minutes after PACU arrival (T5), and 30 minutes after PACU arrival (T6). Compare two perioperative indicators (anesthesia onset time, postoperative awakening time, and extubation time). Compare the pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of two groups at three, 12, and 24 hours after surgery. And the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA) was used to evaluate the number of patients with cognitive impairment at six, 24, and 72 hours after surgery in two groups. Compare the incidence of adverse reactions within 72 hours after surgery between two groups. Results: Compared with the PF group, the PS group had more stable hemodynamics during T2-T5 ( Conclusion: PS is more effective for TURP anesthesia and has a better protective effect on early postoperative cognitive function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.