ReviewPatient preference and adherence2025
Reasons for First Dental Visit in Saudi Arabia: A Systematic Review.
Review in Patient preference and adherence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Reasons for First Dental Visit (RFV) represent patients' subjective motives for seeking dental care and often reflect their most urgent needs. These complaints, frequently related to pain, directly influence diagnosis and treatment planning. Addressing RFV is crucial for patient satisfaction and the delivery of quality oral health care. This systematic review aimed to identify the most commonly reported RFVs at initial dental visits in Saudi Arabia (SA) and to explore the underlying motivations for seeking dental care. Methods: Following a PRISMA-guided protocol, a systematic online search was conducted through PubMed, EMBASE, OVID and Web of Science databases, supplemented by manual searches in regional journals, to identify studies reporting dental RFVs in SA published between 2002 and June 2025. Eligible cross-sectional studies in English and Arabic were screened independently by two reviewers. Data were extracted on study characteristics, demographics, and RFV prevalence/types. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies. Results: Ten cross-sectional studies met the inclusion criteria. The JBI appraisal revealed that 2(20%) were at low risk of bias, 7(70%) were at moderate risk (of which 3 were classified as low-to-moderate), and 1(10%) was high-to-moderate risk. First-visit attendance was largely symptom-driven-pain/emergency (19.8-71.5%) and caries (17.9-45.2%)-while preventive motives were less frequent (check-up 10.5-27.3%; one outlier 40.3%; fluoride/cleaning 3.2-20.5%). Other indications were infrequent (generally ≤10%; eg, trauma 0-9.2%, extraction 2.4-10.6%, malocclusion ~8.8%, discoloration ~5.1%, referral 0.8-0.9%), indicating predominance of restorative or endodontic demand over preventive care. Conclusion: Initial dental visits in SA are predominantly symptom-driven, led by pain and caries, while preventive and elective reasons remain limited. Strengthening public health and clinical initiatives that encourage early, routine attendance through education and recalls is vital to shift dental care utilization toward prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.