Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41459004›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2025

Strategies for adapting under pressure: an interview study in community mental health services.

Ruta Buivydaite, Dulcie Irving, Bethan Page, Bill Tiplady, Charles Vincent

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ruta BuivydaiteDepartment of Social Policy and Intervention, Social Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Dulcie IrvingOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Bethan PageCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.
Bill TipladyOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Charles VincentDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mental health services are operating under significant and sustained pressures. Healthcare professionals and managers are continually making adjustments, often improvised and inconsistent across teams. This study aimed to identify and describe the everyday pressures experienced in community mental health settings and the adaptive strategies used by senior leadership and management staff to respond. The longer-term goal is to inform more coordinated, practical approaches to managing services under pressure. Methods: We conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with 22 senior leadership and management staff from community mental health services within a single NHS Trust in England. Interviews explored the everyday pressures encountered and the strategies adopted in response. Data were analysed thematically using a template analysis approach, guided by our previously developed framework-a taxonomy of pressures and adaptive strategies from earlier studies in surgery and intensive care. Results: The main source of pressure was a shortage of staff with the necessary skills and experience to manage increasing patient numbers and complexity. Strategies were categorised as anticipatory (implemented in advance of expected pressures) and on-the-day responses. Most were anticipatory, reflecting limited capacity for real-time adaptation. Common strategies involved controlling patient demand and prioritising urgent cases, flexing staff allocation, and enhancing staff support, supervision, and coordination. Flexible use of external services, such as primary care and voluntary sector resources, was also reported. Conclusions: Senior mental health staff employ a broad range of adaptive strategies during periods of pressure to manage patient risk, sustain patient flow, and support staff wellbeing. Compared with acute hospital settings such as surgery and intensive care, anticipatory strategies were more prevalent in mental health services, where day-to-day flexibility is constrained by staffing and service structures. There is significant potential to train clinical leaders and teams in the effective use of adaptive strategies and to improve cross-service coordination. The framework used in this study offers a shared language and a practical menu of options to help mental health services prioritise rising patient demand and safeguard staff wellbeing.

Indexed as

adaptive strategiescommunity mental healthlong term strategiespressuresshort term strategies

Identifiers

PMID41459004
PMCPMC12738820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.