Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41459000›Full record

ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2025

Calibrating CT Slice Location and Body Part in Body Part Regression.

Dingjie Su, Thomas Li, Lianrui Zuo, Yucheng Tang, Benoit M Dawant, Bennett A Landman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Insertion Network for Image Sequence Correspondence Building.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2026
    Article
  2. CT CONTRAST PHASE IDENTIFICATION BY PREDICTING THE TEMPORAL ANGLE USING CIRCULAR REGRESSION.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dingjie SuVanderbilt University Department of Computer Science, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.
Thomas LiVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.
Lianrui ZuoVanderbilt University Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.
Yucheng TangNvidia, Redmond, WA 98052, USA.
Benoit M DawantVanderbilt University Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.
Bennett A LandmanVanderbilt University Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.

Funding

Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR) -Identifying correlates of functional immunity in SARS-CoV-2 convalescent plasmaUL1TR002243 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Paul A. Harris, Wesley H Self · 2017 to 2026
$130.7M
Vanderbilt University Biomolecular Multimodal Imaging Center for 3-Dimensional Mapping of the Human KidneyU54DK134302 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI CAPRIOLI, RICHARD M, SPRAGGINS, JEFFREY M · 2022 to 2025
$7.1M
Pancreas Organ Specific ProjectU54EY032442 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI CAPRIOLI, RICHARD M · 2020 to 2024
$5.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002243NEI NIH HHS U54 EY032442NIDDK NIH HHS U54 DK134302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Body part regression is a promising technique for content navigation in computed tomography (CT) images of the human body. This approach involves predicting a position score (scalar value) for each axial slice in a body CT image. These scores establish a one-dimensional universal coordinate system that can localize content-of-interest across different images. Current techniques for body part regression mostly rely on self-supervised learning by assuming that the scores change linearly with the slice indices. One important issue with these techniques is that the predicted scores cannot provide accurate slice localization because they are not calibrated across different images. This work attempts to (1) quantify the theoretically optimal slice localization error using regression scores under linear assumption (regression on ground-truth scores), and (2) improve the slice localization accuracy by incorporating supervised learning using annotations of several key slices in a small dataset. We propose an innovative data augmentation strategy using selective mix-up, and we compare three common ways of adding supervision: (a) supervised training from scratch; (b) fine-tuning the self-supervised model; (C) semi-supervised training. Our results show that the fine-tuned model with the selective mix-up augmentation achieves slice localization error (7.4±6.9 mm) close to the theoretically optimal slice localization error under linear assumption (6.1±6.5 mm), outperforming all other self-supervised and semi-supervised counterparts (>10 mm). Thus, the proposed model is a good candidate of accurate content navigation tool for body CT images.

Indexed as

body CTbody part regressionCT slice localizationself-supervised learning

Identifiers

PMID41459000
PMCPMC12742671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.