Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41458983›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025

Application of artificial intelligence in non-invasive cardiovascular imaging for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Baiyun Liu, Joana Reis, Ankur Sharma, Wei Wang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Baiyun LiuMedical Affairs Radiology, Bayer Healthcare Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Joana ReisMedical Affairs, Radiology, Bayer AG, Oslo, Norway.
Ankur SharmaMedical Affairs Radiology, Bayer Medical Care Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Wei WangMedical Affairs Radiology, Bayer Healthcare Company, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a leading cause of death worldwide. While non-invasive imaging techniques are widely used for diagnosis, their interpretation can be time-consuming and subject to intra- and inter-observer variability. Artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning and deep learning, offers potential advantages in improving diagnostic accuracy and efficiency by rapidly processing large imaging datasets. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to evaluate current evidence on AI applications in non-invasive CAD imaging. Searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Engineering Index, and the Cochrane Library for studies published between 2018 and 2023. A total of 122 studies were included in the evidence map, and 9 studies assessing AI for detecting ≥50% coronary stenosis were selected for meta-analysis. Results: The pooled sensitivity and specificity for detecting stenosis were 0.94 and 0.69, respectively, at the patient level, and 0.81 and 0.88 at the vessel level. The area under the SROC curve was 0.83 (patient level) and 0.92 (vessel level), indicating good diagnostic performance. High heterogeneity was observed across studies. Discussion: These findings suggest that AI holds promise for enhancing the diagnostic process in CAD imaging. However, variability in methodologies and AI implementation underscores the need for standardization and further prospective validation.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecardiovascular imagingcoronary artery diseasenon-invasive imaging modalitiessystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41458983
PMCPMC12741745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.