SynthesisFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Application of artificial intelligence in non-invasive cardiovascular imaging for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Alignment Between Cardiologists and AI-Driven Diagnostic Systems: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a leading cause of death worldwide. While non-invasive imaging techniques are widely used for diagnosis, their interpretation can be time-consuming and subject to intra- and inter-observer variability. Artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning and deep learning, offers potential advantages in improving diagnostic accuracy and efficiency by rapidly processing large imaging datasets. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to evaluate current evidence on AI applications in non-invasive CAD imaging. Searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Engineering Index, and the Cochrane Library for studies published between 2018 and 2023. A total of 122 studies were included in the evidence map, and 9 studies assessing AI for detecting ≥50% coronary stenosis were selected for meta-analysis. Results: The pooled sensitivity and specificity for detecting stenosis were 0.94 and 0.69, respectively, at the patient level, and 0.81 and 0.88 at the vessel level. The area under the SROC curve was 0.83 (patient level) and 0.92 (vessel level), indicating good diagnostic performance. High heterogeneity was observed across studies. Discussion: These findings suggest that AI holds promise for enhancing the diagnostic process in CAD imaging. However, variability in methodologies and AI implementation underscores the need for standardization and further prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.