ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2025
Health disinformation: a call to action for the hemostasis and thrombosis community.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed a parallel crisis: an infodemic of unprecedented scale and impact. This wave of misinformation and disinformation-particularly around thrombosis, vaccines, and hemostasis-has undermined public health measures, eroded institutional trust, and endangered scientific credibility. Within this hostile informational ecosystem, fringe theories proliferated across social media, falsely linking COVID-19 vaccines to widespread thrombosis via misinterpretations of D-dimer levels and anecdotal claims unsupported by clinical evidence. Political agendas, emotional manipulation, and algorithm-driven amplification created fertile ground for disinformation to thrive-especially among vulnerable populations like youth and vaccine-hesitant communities. The article dissects how belief bias, trust shortcuts, groupthink, and platform algorithms contributed to the viral spread of falsehoods about thrombosis and hemostasis. Case studies include the misuse of hydroxychloroquine, antivaccine conspiracy movements, and the misleading portrayal of rare vaccine-induced clotting events. The consequences were severe: declining vaccine uptake, harassment of scientists, and growing skepticism toward evidence-based medicine. This article calls on the hemostasis and thrombosis community to move beyond passive dissemination of knowledge. It proposes a 4-pillar strategy: embedding scientific voices in digital discourse, reforming media and health literacy education, enforcing stronger regulatory frameworks, and institutionalizing collective scientific engagement in mainstream and social media. As future health crises loom, communication must become as central as research itself. The article argues that the next battle for public health will be waged not only in hospitals and laboratories but also in the information spaces where truth competes with virality. It is time for science to go viral-for the right reasons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.