ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Real-world safety of tirofiban: a disproportionality analysis using data from FAERS and WHO-VigiAccess.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to detect tirofiban-related adverse event (AE) signals using the FAERS and WHO-VigiAccess databases to support safer clinical use. Methods: All tirofiban-related AE reports were retrieved from FAERS (2004Q1 to 2024Q4) and WHO-VigiAccess (Retrieval date 2024.12.15). Disproportionality analyses were performed using ROR (Reporting Odds Ratio), PRR (Proportional Reporting Ratio), BCPNN (Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network), and MGPS (Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker) to detect potential drug-AE associations. Time - to - onset was assessed with Weibull distribution and Kaplan-Meier methods. Sensitivity analyses were performed according to reporter type, age group, and sex to assess the robustness of the findings. Results: A total of 2,421 reports from FAERS and 3,485 from WHO-VigiAccess were identified. Bleeding and thrombocytopenia were the most frequent AEs, consistent with drug labeling. Notably, 21 AE signals suggestive of possible associations not listed in the current drug label were observed, such as vascular stent thrombosis and cardiogenic death, which require further studies to verify their causal relationship with tirofiban. The mean onset time was 12 h, and 96.49% occurred within 1 month of exposure. Subgroup analyses showed that male patients exhibited a stronger signal for thrombocytopenia, whereas female patients had a higher risk of ischemic heart disease. Elderly patients (≥65 years) more frequently experienced hemoglobin decreased, while younger patients (<65years) had a higher risk of thrombosis in device. Conclusion: This study identified both known and potentially novel tirofiban-related AEs. The rapid onset, particularly of bleeding and thrombocytopenia, highlights the importance of early monitoring. Management strategies, such as dose adjustment, temporary discontinuation, or supportive treatment including platelet transfusion, may help mitigate severe complications. These findings provide real-world evidence to guide safer tirofiban use, although further studies are required to confirm causality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.