ArticleiScience2025
Deep learning enables accurate diagnosis of acute cholecystitis and prediction of suppuration using noncontrast CT.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Slice-Level Deep Learning Classification of Acute Cholecystitis on Contrast-Enhanced CT: A Single-Center Benchmark of Six CNN Architectures.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A foundation model for acute abdomen diagnosis stratification and triage on noncontrast computed tomography.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Advances in Imaging and Diagnosis of Emphysematous Cholecystitis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To develop a deep learning model using abdominal noncontrast computed tomography (CT) for diagnosing acute cholecystitis (AC) and predicting progression to acute suppurative cholecystitis (ASC). A total of 641 patients from three medical centers were retrospectively analyzed. Deep learning models were constructed for AC diagnosis and ASC prediction. Model interpretability was assessed using gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) and t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding. Performance was compared with radiomics models and radiologist assessments. The deep learning model achieved accuracies of 89.81% (internal) and 81.83% (external) for AC and 84.52% (internal) and 85.60% (external) for ASC prediction. Grad-CAM visualizations showed focus on gallbladder regions and surrounding areas. The multimodal models integrating clinical information outperformed imaging-only models. Deep learning significantly surpassed radiomics models and radiologist assessments, with high computational efficiency (segmentation: 10.5 ± 3.8 s, inference: 1.3 ± 0.4 s). This efficient deep learning system accurately identifies AC and ASC from noncontrast CT, offering robust tools for time-sensitive clinical workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.