ArticleOrthopedic research and reviews2025
Peroneal Artery "Terminal" Perforator Pedicled Flap for Surrounding Soft Tissue Defects: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Orthopedic research and reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To introduce a technique to reconstruct soft tissue defects around the space of lateral malleolus by using the peroneal artery "terminal" perforator flap (the lowest perforating branch of the peroneal in the posterior compartment artery of lateral malleolus), and to report its effectiveness. Methods: From January 2018 to April 2020, 7 patients with soft tissue defects around the space of lateral malleolus were treated with the peroneal artery "terminal" perforator flap. Ultrasound was used to determine the perforating site of the peroneal artery. The lowest perforating branch adjacent to the wound margin was used as the rotation point to design the peroneal artery perforator flap. Results: One case had venous crisis. However, no urgent operative revision was performed. All of the 7 flaps survived completely. The grafted skins at donor site survived, and primary healing of incision was obtained. The follow-up period was 6 to 17 months with an average of 10.7 months. The flaps exhibited favorable color, texture, and overall appearance. The ability to wear shoes remained unaffected, and ankle mobility was not restricted. Surgeries for thinning the flaps were not necessary. All of the patients were satisfied with the cosmetic and functional result. Conclusion: The peroneal artery terminal perforator flap is a useful and reliable choice for coverage of soft tissue defects around the space of lateral malleolus in clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.