Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41458870›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Forgotten Intrauterine Device Causing Postmenopausal Endometritis: A Case Report.

Irem Dogan, Ahmet C Demirsah

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Irem DoganDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bolvadin State Hospital, Afyonkarahisar, TUR.
Ahmet C DemirsahDepartment of Radiology, Bolvadin State Hospital, Afyonkarahisar, TUR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are among the most widely used long-acting reversible contraceptives. Although generally safe, forgotten or retained IUDs, beyond their intended duration, can lead to complications, particularly in postmenopausal women. We describe an 85-year-old gravida 4, para 4 woman, postmenopausal for 40 years, who presented with yellowish vaginal discharge, groin pain, and vaginal bleeding. Transvaginal ultrasound demonstrated irregular echogenicities within the endometrial cavity, while transabdominal ultrasound showed an echogenic structure with posterior acoustic shadowing, suggestive of a retained IUD. A computed tomography (CT) scan performed six months earlier had also revealed the presence of the device, but no intervention was done at that time. The IUD was successfully removed with forceps, despite the absence of retrieval strings, with purulent discharge noted. Histopathology of endometrial curettage confirmed acute and chronic endometritis with abscess formation, but no evidence of malignancy. Symptoms resolved following removal and antibiotic therapy. Retained IUDs in elderly postmenopausal women may remain undetected for decades and present with bleeding, infection, or incidental imaging findings. Prolonged retention is associated with infectious complications and technical difficulties during retrieval. Guidelines recommend removal once contraceptive need has ceased. This case emphasizes the importance of identifying and removing forgotten IUDs in postmenopausal women to prevent infection, ensure accurate imaging interpretation, and allow safe retrieval.

Indexed as

endometritisevaluation of postmenopausal bleedingintrauterine devicepostmenopauseuterine hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID41458870
PMCPMC12742416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.