ArticleCureus2025
Forgotten Intrauterine Device Causing Postmenopausal Endometritis: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An asymptomatic postmenopausal uterine perforation with bilateral embedment by a V-shaped intrauterine device: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are among the most widely used long-acting reversible contraceptives. Although generally safe, forgotten or retained IUDs, beyond their intended duration, can lead to complications, particularly in postmenopausal women. We describe an 85-year-old gravida 4, para 4 woman, postmenopausal for 40 years, who presented with yellowish vaginal discharge, groin pain, and vaginal bleeding. Transvaginal ultrasound demonstrated irregular echogenicities within the endometrial cavity, while transabdominal ultrasound showed an echogenic structure with posterior acoustic shadowing, suggestive of a retained IUD. A computed tomography (CT) scan performed six months earlier had also revealed the presence of the device, but no intervention was done at that time. The IUD was successfully removed with forceps, despite the absence of retrieval strings, with purulent discharge noted. Histopathology of endometrial curettage confirmed acute and chronic endometritis with abscess formation, but no evidence of malignancy. Symptoms resolved following removal and antibiotic therapy. Retained IUDs in elderly postmenopausal women may remain undetected for decades and present with bleeding, infection, or incidental imaging findings. Prolonged retention is associated with infectious complications and technical difficulties during retrieval. Guidelines recommend removal once contraceptive need has ceased. This case emphasizes the importance of identifying and removing forgotten IUDs in postmenopausal women to prevent infection, ensure accurate imaging interpretation, and allow safe retrieval.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.