ArticleCureus2025
Surgery, Science, and Stewardship: The Changing Profile of the Abdominal Transplant Surgeon.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abdominal organ transplantation has undergone remarkable evolution over the past several decades, with clinical outcomes improving steadily and procedure volumes rising in parallel. Despite this progress, the abdominal transplant workforce is shrinking, and interest in fellowship training has noticeably waned, even as surgeons in practice report increasing levels of professional strain. The core challenge is that the responsibilities and expectations of the modern abdominal transplant surgeon are expanding far more rapidly than the field's capacity to train, recruit, and retain its workforce. Emerging innovations, including advanced preservation techniques, ex vivo cellular and genomic interventions, sophisticated immune profiling, and more individualized immunosuppression strategies, are reshaping the discipline, although many of these technologies remain in early development or under preliminary regulatory evaluation. This editorial examines the trajectory of abdominal transplantation, the expanding demands placed on contemporary transplant surgeons, and the workforce, ethical, and scientific pressures that risk widening the gap between the field's aspirations and its practical capacity. We conclude with recommendations aimed at ensuring that the future of abdominal transplantation remains both scientifically ambitious and professionally sustainable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.