Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41458840›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Surgery, Science, and Stewardship: The Changing Profile of the Abdominal Transplant Surgeon.

Dimitrios Moris, Emmanouil Giorgakis

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dimitrios MorisSurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, USA.
Emmanouil GiorgakisSurgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abdominal organ transplantation has undergone remarkable evolution over the past several decades, with clinical outcomes improving steadily and procedure volumes rising in parallel. Despite this progress, the abdominal transplant workforce is shrinking, and interest in fellowship training has noticeably waned, even as surgeons in practice report increasing levels of professional strain. The core challenge is that the responsibilities and expectations of the modern abdominal transplant surgeon are expanding far more rapidly than the field's capacity to train, recruit, and retain its workforce. Emerging innovations, including advanced preservation techniques, ex vivo cellular and genomic interventions, sophisticated immune profiling, and more individualized immunosuppression strategies, are reshaping the discipline, although many of these technologies remain in early development or under preliminary regulatory evaluation. This editorial examines the trajectory of abdominal transplantation, the expanding demands placed on contemporary transplant surgeons, and the workforce, ethical, and scientific pressures that risk widening the gap between the field's aspirations and its practical capacity. We conclude with recommendations aimed at ensuring that the future of abdominal transplantation remains both scientifically ambitious and professionally sustainable.

Indexed as

abdominal transplantationevolutionfuture directionshistoryorgan transplantation and challenges

Identifiers

PMID41458840
PMCPMC12743564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.