ArticleCureus2025
Acute Pulmonary Oedema Secondary to Electrical Cardioversion for Ventricular Tachycardia in a Patient With Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute pulmonary oedema (APO) is a recognised complication of electrical cardioversion, particularly in patients with significant left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, but is likely underreported in the literature. Awareness of this phenomenon and careful post-procedure monitoring are essential, especially in high-risk individuals. We report the case of a 76-year-old male with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (18%), severe mitral and tricuspid regurgitation, a dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), prior percutaneous coronary intervention, left ventricular thrombus, hypertension, and a renal transplant, who presented with worsening dyspnoea. On admission, he was found to be in monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) at 150 bpm with hypotension (80/46 mmHg). Synchronised cardioversion with 50 J successfully restored sinus rhythm. Fourteen hours later, he developed acute respiratory distress, and chest imaging demonstrated new bilateral perihilar opacities consistent with pulmonary oedema. He was treated with intravenous furosemide, a glyceryl trinitrate infusion, and non-invasive ventilation, resulting in rapid clinical improvement. ICD interrogation confirmed a prolonged VT episode with a therapy threshold set too high for detection, prompting reprogramming of the VT zone to 130 bpm. The patient was discharged in stable condition after six days. This case underscores that APO after cardioversion may present in a delayed fashion and may be overlooked without prolonged observation. It also highlights the relevance of cardioversion performed for VT, prolonged pre-existing arrhythmic burden, and multiple comorbidities in predisposing patients to post-cardioversion haemodynamic decompensation. Vigilant monitoring and early intervention are crucial to improving outcomes in high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.