Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41458822›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Immune-Mediated Necrotizing Myopathy: A Systematic Review of Antibody-Specific Mechanisms and Treatment Outcomes.

Zahra Vaezi, Afshin Amini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zahra VaeziInternal Medicine, St. Luke's Hospital, Chesterfield, USA.
Afshin AminiInternal Medicine, St. Luke's Hospital, Chesterfield, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) is a rare, antibody-defined subset of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies characterized by rapidly progressive proximal muscle weakness, markedly elevated creatine kinase (CK) levels, and myofiber necrosis with minimal lymphocytic infiltration. Two major autoantibody subtypes-anti-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (anti-HMGCR) and anti-signal recognition particle (anti-SRP)-define distinct clinical phenotypes, pathophysiologic mechanisms, and treatment responses. Despite growing recognition, optimal management strategies remain uncertain. Following PRISMA 2020 and MOOSE guidelines, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were systematically searched for studies published between January 2011 and May 2025 using terms related to "immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy," "anti-HMGCR," and "anti-SRP". Eligible publications included biopsy-confirmed IMNM cases with antibody documentation and treatment or outcome data. Data extraction encompassed clinical features, immunopathology, therapeutic interventions, and relapse rates. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Checklist, NIH Quality Assessment Tool, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and ROBINS-I, depending on study design. Eighty-eight studies (n ≈ 230 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Anti-HMGCR IMNM typically affected middle-aged adults and was frequently associated with statin exposure, while anti-SRP IMNM presented at younger ages with more severe and treatment-refractory disease. Corticosteroids and IVIG were the most commonly used first-line agents, with additional benefit from steroid-sparing immunosuppressants (mycophenolate, azathioprine, methotrexate). Rituximab and other B-cell-targeted biologics achieved remission in approximately 60-70% of refractory cases, and emerging complement or FcRn-directed therapies showed early promise. Relapse occurred in 25-35% of cases, most often after tapering corticosteroids or immunosuppressants. Overall methodological quality was moderate to high, with 82% of studies meeting ≥75% of appraisal criteria across risk-of-bias domains. IMNM demonstrates antibody-specific differences in clinical course, therapeutic response, and prognosis. Early, aggressive, and combination immunotherapy improves outcomes, while novel biologic agents may benefit refractory disease. The overall certainty of evidence is moderate, supporting current management strategies yet underscoring the need for standardized diagnostic criteria and prospective multicenter studies to refine treatment algorithms and identify biomarkers of durable remission.

Indexed as

anti-hmgcr antibodyanti-srp antibodyautoimmune myopathyimmune-mediated necrotizing myopathystatin-associated myopathy

Identifiers

PMID41458822
PMCPMC12743563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.