Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41458783›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

One Versus Two Screw Fixation in Minimally Invasive Hallux Valgus Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Thomas L Lewis, Lily Fletcher, Ettore Vulcano, Tyler Gonzalez, Jonathan Kaplan, Choon Chiet Hong, Bradley P Abicht, Robbie Ray, Peter Lam

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. [MIS Hallux valgus].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Thomas L LewisTrauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, London, GBR.
Lily FletcherFoot and Ankle Surgery, Orthopaedic and Arthritis Specialist Centre, Victoria, AUS.
Ettore VulcanoOrthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami, USA.
Tyler GonzalezOrthopaedic Surgery, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA.
Jonathan KaplanOrthopaedics, Duke Orthopaedics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA.
Choon Chiet HongOrthopaedic Surgery, National University Hospital of Singapore, Singapore, SGP.
Bradley P AbichtOrthopaedics, Podiatry, and Sports Medicine, Emplify Health by Gundersen, La Crosse, USA.
Robbie RayTrauma and Orthopaedics, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.
Peter LamFoot and Ankle Surgery, Orthopaedic and Arthritis Specialist Centre, Victoria, AUS.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for hallux valgus has evolved significantly, with ongoing debate about optimal fixation methods. Fourth-generation techniques typically use two metatarsal screws; however, single screw fixation may reduce operative time, radiation exposure, and cost. This systematic review compares clinical outcomes, radiographic results, and complications between one- and two-screw metatarsal fixation in minimally invasive hallux valgus correction. A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane databases from inception to March 2025. Studies comparing single versus two screw fixation in minimally invasive hallux valgus surgery were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk Of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Primary outcomes included radiographic parameters (Hallux Valgus Angle (HVA), Intermetatarsal Angle (IMA), Distal Metatarsal Articular Angle (DMAA)) and clinical outcomes (American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Score (AOFAS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ)). Secondary outcomes included operative details, complications, and revision surgery rates. Five studies met inclusion criteria: two clinical (n = 153 patients, 162 feet) and three biomechanical studies. Clinical studies showed comparable radiographic correction and patient-reported outcomes between fixation methods. Single screw fixation demonstrated significantly shorter operative time and reduced fluoroscopy exposure. Hardware-related complications requiring removal were higher in two-screw groups (32% vs. 3% in one study; 1.9% vs. 0% in another). Biomechanical studies revealed that single screw fixation may provide insufficient rotational stability, while two-screw configurations demonstrated improved construct stability. Current evidence suggests that single screw fixation may reduce radiation exposure, surgical time, and hardware removal rates, but offers reduced biomechanical stability compared to a two-screw construct in patients undergoing minimally invasive hallux valgus surgery. However, the high risk of bias, limited comparative data, methodological heterogeneity, and relatively short follow-up periods in existing studies preclude definitive conclusions. Current evidence is insufficient to establish definitive recommendations, and fixation strategy should be individualised based on deformity characteristics and patient factors.

Indexed as

biomechanical stabilitybuniondual screwhallux valgushardware complicationsmetatarsal osteotomyminimally invasive surgerypercutaneous fixationscrew fixationsingle screw

Identifiers

PMID41458783
PMCPMC12743283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.