ArticleCureus2025
Improving Delirium Screening and Management in a Hospice Inpatient Unit: Audit and Quality Improvement Cycles Using the 4AT (Alertness, Abbreviated Mental Test-4 (AMT4), Attention, Acute Change) Tool.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDelirium is highly prevalent in palliative care settings, contributing to patient distress, poorer outcomes, and increased mortality. Although validated screening tools exist, many hospices in the UK rely on clinical judgement alone. In this study, we evaluated the use of the 4AT (Alertness, Abbreviated Mental Test-4 (AMT4), Attention, Acute Change) delirium screening tool on admission to a hospice inpatient unit (IPU) and implemented quality improvement (QI) interventions to enhance subsequent documentation and management.
methodsA retrospective audit of 25 admissions to the IPU at Princess Alice Hospice in London, UK, in August 2023, assessed 4AT completion rates, resultant scores, documentation of contributing factors, and clinical actions taken. The findings informed a QI project employing two Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. Interventions included modifying the electronic medical record (EMR) template, embedding a delirium clinical guide, and educating clinicians. Anonymous questionnaires gathered feedback on usability and clinician confidence before and after the interventions.
resultsIn the audit, 88% of patients had 4AT assessments completed, with 36% scoring ≥4 (suggesting possible delirium). No explicit causes or structured action plans were recorded, despite the implication of contributing factors. Following QI interventions, staff reported that the modified EMR template had improved their documentation and was user-friendly. Clinician confidence in managing patients with high 4AT scores increased: 75% of respondents felt "very confident" post-intervention compared with 14% at baseline. DISCUSSION: The 4AT screening tool can be effectively integrated into hospice admission workflows. Targeted EMR modifications and clinician education improved documentation and confidence, supporting the better identification and management of delirium. Limitations include small sample size, single-site design, and reliance on qualitative staff feedback.
conclusionsEmbedding a structured screening tool within EMR, supported by clinical guidance and education, enhances the assessment and management of delirium in hospices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.