ReviewCureus2025
Advances and Challenges in 3D Bioprinting for Organ Transplantation: Bridging the Gap Between Research and Clinical Applications.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Narrative Review of Advances in Skin Tissue Engineering: From Physiological Architecture to 3D Bioprinting.Cureus · 2026Review
- Bioinks in systems biology: integrating biomaterial design with cellular network modelling for predictive biofabrication.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Recent advances in multimodal foundation model-enabled peptide screening and optimization for smart biomaterials and functional tissue engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global shortage of organs continues to remain a significant challenge in modern medicine, with the demand for organs greatly exceeding the available supply. In this context, 3D bioprinting has emerged as a transformative technology within regenerative medicine, offering the potential to create patient-specific functional organs for transplantation. This review explores the significant advances in 3D bioprinting, highlighting the development of complex techniques like extrusion-based and volumetric bioprinting, innovations in bioink formulation utilizing decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) and stem cells, and novel strategies for constructing functional vascular networks within engineered tissues. However, the clinical application of bio-printed organs encounters significant obstacles, including technical limitations in scaling up production, biological challenges such as immune rejection and functional maturation, and the absence of standardized regulatory frameworks. To address this gap, we propose multidisciplinary approaches, including the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) for organ design, strategic collaborations between industry and academia, and the development of clear regulatory frameworks. By addressing these challenges through collaborative global efforts, 3D bioprinting has the potential to revolutionize organ transplantation and eventually eliminate organ waitlists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.