ReviewCureus2025
Diagnostic Accuracy of Serum Anti-phospholipase A2 Receptor (PLA2R) Antibody Assays for Membranous Nephropathy in Patients With Nephrotic Syndrome: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Animal models of idiopathic membranous nephropathy: Recent advances and future perspectives.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary membranous nephropathy (MN) is a common cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults, and circulating anti-phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) antibodies have emerged as a key diagnostic biomarker. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of eight studies evaluating serum PLA2R antibody testing against kidney biopsy, with sample sizes ranging from 117 to 670 participants. Extracted data included assay type, cutoff values, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC), where available. Across 2,600+ patients, reported sensitivities ranged from 60% to 80.75%, while specificity was generally ≥90%, and five studies reported AUCs between 0.83 and 0.935, with a weighted mean AUC of 0.877. Lower cutoffs (~2-3 RU/ml) increased sensitivity at the cost of slightly reduced specificity. In contrast, higher cutoffs (>20 RU/ml) improved specificity at the cost of lower sensitivity, and combined ELISA and confirmatory indirect immunofluorescence further increased specificity to 100% but decreased sensitivity. These findings indicate that serum PLA2R antibody testing is a reliable rule-in diagnostic tool for MN, although negative results cannot reliably exclude the disease. Future large-scale prospective studies with standardized cutoffs and complete 2 × 2 contingency data are needed to enable formal meta-analytic pooling and optimize diagnostic thresholds and cutoff selection for clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.