ArticleCureus2025
Femoral Vein Diameter as a Predictor for Intravascular Volume Status.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The central venous pressure (CVP) is used as a tool for assessing volume status in hypotensive patients. Ultrasonographic inferior vena cava (IVC) measurement has been accepted as a surrogate measure of CVP. But IVC visualization is occasionally cumbersome. Hence our study attempts to assess the correlation of femoral vein diameter (FVD) and CVP. Methods The study is a prospective observational study conducted among the hypotensive Emergency Department patients of a tertiary care centre in Kerala. Based on an earlier study sample size calculated was 27. Pregnant females, patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT), patients with acute heart failure and patients who did not consent were excluded. IVC diameter and FVD were measured ultrasonographically. CVP was measured using a transducer. Pearson's correlation coefficient between FVD and CVP was computed. Results There is a strong positive correlation between FVD and CVP (r=0.919, p<0.001). The regression equation of CVP on FVD was CVP = 0.535+9.275*FVD. FVD of 1.2cm had a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 94.4% in predicting CVP >12mm of Hg (high CVP). FVD less than 0.8cm had a sensitivity of 25% and specificity of 100% in predicting CVP <8mm of Hg (low CVP) and had a positive predictive value of 100%. Conclusion The study had concluded a strong linear correlation between CVP and FVD. Hence FVD can be used as a surrogate marker of CVP to predict the volume status. FVD <0.8 cm is specific in detecting the low CVP group. FVD is of good statistical quality in predicting the high CVP group. Hence the complications of unwanted fluid resuscitation can be avoided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.