ArticleCureus2025
Real-World Clinical Outcomes of Darolutamide in Older Patients With Non-metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Multi-institutional Comparative Analysis of Efficacy and Tolerability.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Reassessing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in older men with advanced prostate cancer: when to use, when to discontinue, and role as monotherapy?]Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background There is still a lack of real-world data comparing clinical use of darolutamide, oncological outcomes, and safety profiles among older patients. We aimed to evaluate the real-world clinical outcomes of darolutamide in older patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) by comparing efficacy and tolerability across different age groups. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 36 patients with nmCRPC who received darolutamide at nine institutions. Patients were stratified into two age-based subgroups: ≥75 vs. <75 years and ≥80 vs. <80 years. Primary outcomes were oncological, including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (50% or 90% decline), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included safety, adverse events (AEs), and rates of treatment interruption, discontinuation, and dose reduction. Results Twenty-five patients (69.4%) were aged ≥75 years, and 13 patients (36.1%) were aged ≥80 years. The overall PSA response rates were 88.9% for a 50% decline and 69.4% for a 90% decline. PSA response did not differ between age groups for either 75- or 80-year thresholds. No significant differences were observed in PFS or OS between subgroups. The incidence of all-grade and grade ≥3 AEs was comparable across age groups. However, patients aged ≥80 years showed significantly higher rates of dose reduction or treatment interruption (P = 0.016). Conclusions Darolutamide demonstrated high PSA response rates and favorable survival outcomes in elderly patients with nmCRPC. Its effectiveness was consistent across age subgroups. While overall safety profiles were similar, patients aged ≥80 years were more likely to need dose adjustments or temporary treatment interruptions, supporting the use of this drug in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.