Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41458705›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Beyond the Scalpel: Improving Operative Note Quality in Gabeet Specialized Hospital, Sudan.

Amir Malik Ibrahim Algak, Sara Omer Mohamed Abdalla, Gorashey Ahmed, Abdulrahman Abbas Yusuf Mohammed, Ismail Hassan Ahmed Eltayb, Mohamed Adil Alrofae Ibrahim, Mohamed Osman Mohamed Idres, Awab Babiker, Fatimah Mohammed Osman Mohammedali, Mohamed Elmuntasir Omer Awad Elhag and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Amir Malik Ibrahim AlgakSurgery, Gabeet Specialized Hospital, Almanagil, SDN.
Sara Omer Mohamed AbdallaSurgery, Gabeet Specialized Hospital, Almanagil, SDN.
Gorashey AhmedGeneral Surgery, Procare Riaya Hospital, Al-Khobar, SAU.
Abdulrahman Abbas Yusuf MohammedSurgery, Gabeet Specialized Hospital, Almanagil, SDN.
Ismail Hassan Ahmed EltaybSurgery, Gabeet Specialized Hospital, Almanagil, SDN.
Mohamed Adil Alrofae IbrahimSurgery, Gabeet Specialized Hospital, Almanagil, SDN.
Mohamed Osman Mohamed IdresSurgery, Gabeet Specialized Hospital, Almanagil, SDN.
Awab BabikerSurgery, Gabeet Specialized Hospital, Almanagil, SDN.
Fatimah Mohammed Osman MohammedaliSurgery, Gabeet Specialized Hospital, Almanagil, SDN.
Mohamed Elmuntasir Omer Awad ElhagSurgery, Gabeet Specialized Hospital, Almanagil, SDN.
Abdulrahman MohammedSurgery, Gabeet Specialized Hospital, Almanagil, SDN.
Sahar Medani Ahmed OsmanSurgery, Gabeet Specialized Hospital, Almanagil, SDN.
Mohammed Abdurhman Minallah BabikerSurgery, Gabeet Specialized Hospital, Almanagil, SDN.
Hassan Khalaf Allah Hassan MohammedSurgery, Gabeet Specialized Hospital, Almanagil, SDN.
Ameer Abdallatif Saeed ElkhazinSurgery, Gabeet Specialized Hospital, Almanagil, SDN.
Amany Amin Ali HussienSurgery, Gabeet Specialized Hospital, Almanagil, SDN.
Mihad MutasimGeneral Surgery, Gabeet Specialized Hospital, Almanagil, SDN.
Qusai Dafallah Ali EltiebGeneral Surgery, Gabeet Specialized Hospital, Almanagil, SDN.
Ali Elzain Elshareef ElhasanGeneral Surgery, Gabeet Specialized Hospital, Almanagil, SDN.
Abumadian Elshiekh Eltayeb FadlalmulaGeneral Surgery, Gabeet Specialized Hospital, Almanagil, SDN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Operative notes are important medicolegal documents that guarantee patient safety and clinical handover, as well as support audit and research. Nevertheless, in most low- and middle-income countries, the quality of documentation is suboptimal even despite the official guidelines of the Royal College of Surgeons (RCS). This closed-loop audit aimed to evaluate and enhance the quality of the documentation of operative notes in Gabeet Specialized Hospital, Sudan. Methodology The proposed quality improvement project was a three-month study (May-July 2025). Two auditing cycles (n = 51) of operative notes were audited against RCS standards. After the initial cycle, interventions were performed, such as educating the staff, introducing standardized proformas, visual reminders, and increasing supervision. This formed the first part of the audit loop, followed by targeted changes and a planned re-audit. In the second cycle, documentation completeness was reevaluated, and compliance rates were compared, thereby completing the audit loop process. Results The mean compliance increased from 41.3% in the first cycle to 71.6% in the second (a 73% relative increase) against the RCS Good Surgical Practice (2025) standards. Significant gains were observed in the documentation of date, time, and type of operation (60.8% to 98%, p < 0.001); operative diagnosis and findings (55% to 84.3%, p < 0.001); and prophylaxis measures (39.2% to 90%, p < 0.001). Improvements were also seen for incision type and closure technique (51% to 75%, p = 0.01) and problems/complications (29.4% to 65%, p = 0.02). More modest changes were noted for tissue/prostheses details (25% to 39.2%, p = 0.05) and postoperative care instructions (20% to 29.4%, p = 0.08). Surgeon signature improved from 35% to 51% (p = 0.04). Conclusions Operational interventions improved compliance with documentation standards, but important gaps remain. Strengthening supervision, embedding regular audits, and adopting structured or electronic operative note systems are necessary to support sustained improvement and enhance patient safety.

Indexed as

clinical auditdocumentation standardsoperative notespatient safetyquality improvementsudan

Identifiers

PMID41458705
PMCPMC12739556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.