ArticleCureus2025
Evaluation of Force Decay in Intraoral Elastics With Different Lumen Sizes: An In Vitro Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOrthodontic elastics are routinely used for molar correction and space closure; however, their clinical efficiency may be compromised by gradual force degradation. Since elastics of different lumen sizes may be prescribed sequentially for the same patient, assessing their stability and the influence of mouthwash exposure is clinically relevant. MATERIALS AND
methodsLatex intraoral elastics (OSL Orthodontic Intraoral Elastics) of five different lumen sizes (1/8", 3/16", 1/4", 5/16", and 3/8"), each designed to deliver 3.5 oz of force, were tested. Fifty samples were divided into two groups: Group A (stored in artificial saliva) and Group B (treated with chlorhexidine mouthwash at predetermined intervals). The elastics were extended to three times their lumen size using custom jigs. Force values were recorded at baseline, one, three, 12, and 24 hours using a digital gauge, and the percentage of force decay was calculated. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and independent
resultsAll elastics demonstrated progressive force decay over time. Larger lumen elastics (A3 and A4) maintained force more effectively, whereas smaller lumen sizes (A1 and A2) exhibited greater force loss, particularly at 12-24 hours. Mouthwash exposure produced variable effects, with significant differences observed among selected elastics at specific intervals.
conclusionsLumen size plays a critical role in the force decay of intraoral elastics, with smaller lumen elastics showing earlier and greater force loss. Mouthwash exposure inconsistently alters this pattern, emphasizing the need for careful patient selection and guidance in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.