ArticleCureus2025
Implementation of Guidelines and a Decision Support Tool for Blood Glucose Monitoring Device Prescriptions in Saudi Arabia: Compliance Assessment and Potential Cost Savings and Coverage Expansion.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient-Centered Diabetes Care Through an Ethical Lens: Associations with Patient Satisfaction and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Saudi Primary Healthcare.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction The Saudi Ministry of Health implemented prescribing guidelines and an integrated Decision Support Tool within the electronic prescription system to enforce eligibility, quantity, and timing criteria for blood glucose monitoring devices. This study assessed guideline compliance, estimated potential cost savings, and modeled the potential expansion in patient coverage resulting from the rejection of non-compliant prescriptions. Methods This was a cross-sectional, descriptive study. Data were collected from the records of the electronic prescription system ("Wasfaty"), covering prescriptions for blood glucose monitoring devices issued between January and December 2023, both overall and by specific item. The data also included the number of prescriptions rejected due to non-compliance with guidelines, both in total and by item type, and the costs of the different blood glucose monitoring devices. Potential new patient coverage was modeled by dividing rejected items by the standard per-patient allocation over the prescribed interval. Results The Decision Support Tool rejected 1,600,517 non-compliant prescriptions for blood glucose monitoring devices, constituting 0.9% of the total prescriptions issued in 2023. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system readers showed the highest non-compliance rate (64.6%), followed by glucometers (49.3%) and CGM system sensors (31.1%), while glucometer strips and lancets had minimal non-compliance rates (0.70% and 0.50%, respectively). The potential cost savings from rejecting non-compliant prescriptions totaled approximately USD 25.6 million (96 million Saudi Riyals). The greatest savings came from flash glucose monitoring system sensors (62.5%), followed by glucometer devices (14.6%), and glucometer strips (11.5%). The rejection of non-compliant prescriptions could enable expanded coverage of new patients, including 63,367 annually for glucometer strips, 56,399 for glucometer lancets, 212,529 for glucometers, 64,394 for glucose monitoring system sensors, and 28,025 for glucose monitoring system readers, based on standard prescription intervals. Conclusion Non-compliance was highest for CGM system readers, glucometers, and CGM system sensors. The rejection of non-compliant prescriptions through prescribing guidelines using the Decision Support Tool potentially leads to cost savings and expansion of blood glucose monitoring device coverage. Further research in Saudi Arabia is needed to identify factors influencing guideline adherence and to evaluate the intervention's impact on clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.