ArticleCureus2025
Effects of Reinforcement Materials and Mechanical Retention on the Flexural Strength and Deflection of Repaired Denture Base Resin.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing prevalence of denture base fractures among older patients underscores the clinical importance of effective repair strategies. The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of mechanical retention forms and reinforcement materials on the flexural strength and deflection of repaired denture base resin. Rectangular specimens (65 × 10 × 2.5 mm) were prepared from autopolymerizing resin and divided into seven groups: control (C), resin-only (R), primer-treated (RP), two interlocks (IL2), four interlocks (IL4), two parallel wires (W2), S-shaped wire (WS), and metal mesh (MM). Repairs were performed using autopolymerizing resin and tested under three-point bending (span: 50 mm; crosshead speed: 5 mm/min). The C group exhibited a flexural strength of 157.1 ± 14.3 MPa, while the R group showed the lowest (54.4 ± 10.2 MPa). Primer application improved strength to 92.2 ± 19.0 MPa, and wire reinforcement, particularly the W2 configuration, restored flexural strength comparable to the C group (163.5 ± 18.7 MPa). All repair groups showed reduced deflection relative to the C group, with the W2 group demonstrating the greatest preservation of flexibility (4.9 ± 1.0 mm vs. 7.7 ± 1.4 mm). These findings indicate that primer treatment combined with suitable reinforcement effectively enhances the mechanical properties of repaired denture base resin. Although full recovery of original strength and flexibility was not achieved, wire reinforcement provided superior load resistance, while metal mesh offered practical advantages for chairside or domiciliary repairs. Further studies on primer formulations and long-term durability are recommended to refine clinical repair protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.