Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41458671›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Effects of Reinforcement Materials and Mechanical Retention on the Flexural Strength and Deflection of Repaired Denture Base Resin.

Masatoshi Iwasaki, Takashi Iida, Yuki Ishii, Yuichiro Yamakawa, Mika Honda-Sakaki, Yoshihiro Iwata, Yuna Yanagizono, Chihiro Watanabe-Iwasaki, Osamu Komiyama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Masatoshi IwasakiDepartment of Prosthodontics and Oral Rehabilitation, Nihon University School of Dentistry at Matsudo, Chiba, JPN.
Takashi IidaDepartment of Prosthodontics and Oral Rehabilitation, Nihon University School of Dentistry at Matsudo, Chiba, JPN.
Yuki IshiiDepartment of Prosthodontics and Oral Rehabilitation, Nihon University School of Dentistry at Matsudo, Chiba, JPN.
Yuichiro YamakawaDepartment of Prosthodontics and Oral Rehabilitation, Nihon University School of Dentistry at Matsudo, Chiba, JPN.
Mika Honda-SakakiDepartment of Anatomy, Nihon University School of Dentistry at Matsudo, Chiba, JPN.
Yoshihiro IwataDepartment of Prosthodontics and Oral Rehabilitation, Nihon University School of Dentistry at Matsudo, Chiba, JPN.
Yuna YanagizonoDepartment of Prosthodontics and Oral Rehabilitation, Nihon University School of Dentistry at Matsudo, Chiba, JPN.
Chihiro Watanabe-IwasakiDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Nihon University School of Dentistry at Matsudo, Chiba, JPN.
Osamu KomiyamaDepartment of Prosthodontics and Oral Rehabilitation, Nihon University School of Dentistry at Matsudo, Chiba, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of denture base fractures among older patients underscores the clinical importance of effective repair strategies. The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of mechanical retention forms and reinforcement materials on the flexural strength and deflection of repaired denture base resin. Rectangular specimens (65 × 10 × 2.5 mm) were prepared from autopolymerizing resin and divided into seven groups: control (C), resin-only (R), primer-treated (RP), two interlocks (IL2), four interlocks (IL4), two parallel wires (W2), S-shaped wire (WS), and metal mesh (MM). Repairs were performed using autopolymerizing resin and tested under three-point bending (span: 50 mm; crosshead speed: 5 mm/min). The C group exhibited a flexural strength of 157.1 ± 14.3 MPa, while the R group showed the lowest (54.4 ± 10.2 MPa). Primer application improved strength to 92.2 ± 19.0 MPa, and wire reinforcement, particularly the W2 configuration, restored flexural strength comparable to the C group (163.5 ± 18.7 MPa). All repair groups showed reduced deflection relative to the C group, with the W2 group demonstrating the greatest preservation of flexibility (4.9 ± 1.0 mm vs. 7.7 ± 1.4 mm). These findings indicate that primer treatment combined with suitable reinforcement effectively enhances the mechanical properties of repaired denture base resin. Although full recovery of original strength and flexibility was not achieved, wire reinforcement provided superior load resistance, while metal mesh offered practical advantages for chairside or domiciliary repairs. Further studies on primer formulations and long-term durability are recommended to refine clinical repair protocols.

Indexed as

denture repairdomiciliary dental caremean flexural strengthprosthodontics-related dental materialresin reinforcement

Identifiers

PMID41458671
PMCPMC12739970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.