ArticleCureus2025
Symptom Duration as a Predictor of Neurological Recovery After Decompression Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- One- to two-year outcomes after surgery for cervical myelopathy: a systematic review of symptom duration and baseline severity.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The impact of symptom duration on postoperative recovery in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) remains controversial. While earlier decompression is often recommended, patient outcomes are likely influenced by a combination of factors. This study aimed to evaluate whether the duration of symptoms significantly affects neurological recovery. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 142 consecutive patients (mean age 66.2 years, 63% male) who underwent anterior or posterior cervical decompression. Baseline variables included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status, number of stenotic segments, surgical approach, preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and duration of symptoms. Neurological function was assessed by JOA score preoperatively and at three and 12 months postoperatively. Multivariate linear regression identified independent predictors of continuous JOA change, while multivariate logistic regression assessed factors associated with achieving a clinically meaningful gain (≥1.5 points in JOA score). Results Overall, JOA scores improved by 1.16 ± 2.1 points (8.9%; p < 0.001) at three months and by 1.60 ± 2.2 points (12.2%; p < 0.001) at 12 months. Patients with severe myelopathy (JOA < 12) demonstrated the greatest gains (+1.99 at three months; +4.58 at 12 months; both p < 0.01), whereas those with mild symptoms showed minimal change. In multivariate analysis, a lower baseline JOA score was the sole predictor of greater continuous improvement at three months (p < 0.001) and remained significant at 12 months alongside ASA class (p = 0.017) and BMI (p = 0.027). Symptom duration did not predict the magnitude of continuous change. However, each additional month of preoperative symptoms decreased the odds of achieving a ≥1.5-point gain at three months by 0.7% (p = 0.045). By 12 months, only patient sex (male vs. female; OR: 0.81; p = 0.046) independently predicted clinically meaningful recovery. Conclusion Baseline neurological impairment is the strongest determinant of postoperative improvement in DCM, with systemic health also influencing long-term gains. Although longer symptom duration modestly reduces the likelihood of early clinically meaningful recovery, substantial improvement remains achievable after delay. These findings reinforce the importance of early diagnosis and timely surgical referral.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.