ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Toxicity profiles of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors: safety analysis from clinical trials and the FDA adverse event reporting system.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the comprehensive safety profile of CDK4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer treatment by analyzing real-world adverse event (AE) data and systematically reviewing clinical trial findings to provide evidence-based safety guidance. Methods: A disproportionality analysis based on real-world data from the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) was combined with a systematic review to evaluate adverse events (AEs) associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors. A total of 16 studies involving 6,722 patients with advanced breast cancer were included to analyze the toxicity risks of CDK4/6 inhibitor combination therapies. Temporal patterns of AEs were assessed using FAERS data, and signal strengths were determined using the reporting odds ratio (ROR). Results: Combination therapy with CDK4/6 inhibitors significantly increased the risk of grade 3-5 AEs. FAERS analysis revealed that most AEs occurred within the first month of treatment, with the lowest incidence between the second and sixth months, followed by a significant rise thereafter. All CDK4/6 inhibitors were associated with myelosuppression, gastrointestinal toxicity, interstitial lung disease (ILD), and QT prolongation. Disproportionality analysis for "Torsade de pointes/QT prolongation" identified Ribociclib as the only agent with a strong positive signal (ROR 6.16, 95% CI 5.54-6.84). Additionally, unexpected AEs such as peripheral neuropathy, taste disorders, and epistaxis were detected. Conclusion: Clinicians should prioritize monitoring for myelosuppression, gastrointestinal toxicity, and QT prolongation (particularly with Ribociclib) during the first month of CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy. Long-term surveillance beyond 6 months is crucial to detect delayed-onset AEs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.