Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41458615›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Toxicity profiles of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors: safety analysis from clinical trials and the FDA adverse event reporting system.

Jin Zhou, Xinmiao Lin, Shue Wang, Mumu Xie, Xiao Hu, Jiaqin Cai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jin ZhouDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Xinmiao LinSchool of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Shue WangInformation Management Department, Key Laboratory of Medical Big Data Engineering, Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Mumu XieDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Xiao HuDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Jiaqin CaiDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the comprehensive safety profile of CDK4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer treatment by analyzing real-world adverse event (AE) data and systematically reviewing clinical trial findings to provide evidence-based safety guidance. Methods: A disproportionality analysis based on real-world data from the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) was combined with a systematic review to evaluate adverse events (AEs) associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors. A total of 16 studies involving 6,722 patients with advanced breast cancer were included to analyze the toxicity risks of CDK4/6 inhibitor combination therapies. Temporal patterns of AEs were assessed using FAERS data, and signal strengths were determined using the reporting odds ratio (ROR). Results: Combination therapy with CDK4/6 inhibitors significantly increased the risk of grade 3-5 AEs. FAERS analysis revealed that most AEs occurred within the first month of treatment, with the lowest incidence between the second and sixth months, followed by a significant rise thereafter. All CDK4/6 inhibitors were associated with myelosuppression, gastrointestinal toxicity, interstitial lung disease (ILD), and QT prolongation. Disproportionality analysis for "Torsade de pointes/QT prolongation" identified Ribociclib as the only agent with a strong positive signal (ROR 6.16, 95% CI 5.54-6.84). Additionally, unexpected AEs such as peripheral neuropathy, taste disorders, and epistaxis were detected. Conclusion: Clinicians should prioritize monitoring for myelosuppression, gastrointestinal toxicity, and QT prolongation (particularly with Ribociclib) during the first month of CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy. Long-term surveillance beyond 6 months is crucial to detect delayed-onset AEs.

Indexed as

CDK4/6inhibitorsmetanetworkpharmacoepidemiologypharmacovigilanceprofilestoxicity

Identifiers

PMID41458615
PMCPMC12738172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.