Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41458614›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025

Enhanced recovery after surgery: Narrative review in gynecologic pelvic exenterations.

Abigail Barger, Sarah P Huepenbecker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abigail BargerGynecologic Oncology, St. Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, PA, United States.
Sarah P HuepenbeckerGynecologic Oncology, St. Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, PA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this narrative review, we discuss enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in pelvic exenterations from a gynecology oncology perspective. There is limited evidence regarding perioperative guidelines for this complex surgical procedure. We will review ERAS societal guidelines, collaborative reviews, expert opinions and provide tables summarizing the pre-admission, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative guidelines provided by these sources. We will look at how ERAS protocols have been used in published studies. Lastly, we discuss potential future directions for perioperative care in pelvic exenterations.

Indexed as

enhanced recovery after surgeryERASgynecologic oncologypelvic exenterationperioperativepostoperativesurgery

Identifiers

PMID41458614
PMCPMC12740913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.